When you’re injured in an accident due to someone else’s negligence, you may assume that you’re entitled to full compensation for your damages. However, in many cases, you could be found partially responsible for the accident. Comparative negligence is a legal principle that affects how much compensation you can receive if you’re partly at fault for your injury. Depending on the laws of your state, your level of responsibility could reduce your settlement or even bar you from recovering damages altogether.
In this article, we’ll explain how comparative negligence works, the different types of comparative negligence systems, and how being partially at fault can affect your personal injury claim.
1. What Is Comparative Negligence?
Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine used to determine how much compensation you can recover in a personal injury case when more than one party is at fault. Under comparative negligence, your compensation is reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to you. This principle acknowledges that accidents are not always the result of one party’s negligence and that multiple people can share responsibility.
For example, if you are found to be 20% at fault for a car accident and the other driver is 80% at fault, your compensation will be reduced by 20%. If your total damages amount to $100,000, you would receive $80,000 instead of the full amount.
Why it matters:
Comparative negligence ensures that injured parties can still recover compensation even if they are partially responsible for the accident. However, it also means that your level of fault will directly impact how much compensation you can receive.
Key takeaway:
Under comparative negligence, your compensation is reduced by your percentage of fault. The more fault attributed to you, the less compensation you receive.
2. Types of Comparative Negligence Systems
There are three main types of comparative negligence systems used in the United States: pure comparative negligence, modified comparative negligence, and contributory negligence. The laws in your state will determine which system applies to your case and how much compensation you can recover.
A. Pure Comparative Negligence
In a pure comparative negligence system, you can recover compensation regardless of your percentage of fault, even if you are primarily responsible for the accident. Under this system, your compensation is simply reduced by your degree of fault, no matter how high that percentage is.
Example:
If you are 90% at fault for an accident and the other party is 10% at fault, you can still recover 10% of your total damages. So, if your total damages are $50,000, you would receive $5,000.
States that follow pure comparative negligence include:
- California
- Florida
- New York
- Washington
Why it matters:
Pure comparative negligence allows you to recover some compensation even if you bear most of the responsibility for the accident.
A. Modified Comparative Negligence
Modified comparative negligence is the most common system in the U.S., and it places a limit on how much fault you can have and still recover damages. There are two versions of modified comparative negligence:
- 50% Bar Rule: You can recover damages as long as you are 50% or less at fault. If you are more than 50% responsible, you are barred from recovering any compensation.
- 51% Bar Rule: You can recover damages as long as you are 49% or less at fault. If you are 50% or more responsible, you cannot recover compensation.
Example:
If you are found to be 40% at fault and your total damages are $100,000, you would receive $60,000 (your compensation is reduced by 40%). However, if you are found to be 51% at fault, you would receive nothing under the 51% bar rule.
States that follow the 50% bar rule include:
- Arkansas
- Colorado
- Georgia
States that follow the 51% bar rule include:
- Illinois
- Massachusetts
- Texas
Why it matters:
In modified comparative negligence states, once your level of fault exceeds the set threshold (either 50% or 51%), you lose the ability to recover any damages.
C. Contributory Negligence
In a contributory negligence system, if you are found to be even 1% at fault, you are barred from recovering any compensation. This is the harshest form of negligence law and is only followed by a few states.
Example:
If your damages are $50,000 but you are found to be 5% at fault for the accident, you would receive no compensation under a contributory negligence system.
States that follow contributory negligence include:
- Alabama
- Maryland
- North Carolina
- Virginia
Why it matters:
Contributory negligence laws can prevent you from recovering any compensation, even if you are only minimally at fault.
3. How Comparative Negligence Affects Your Compensation
The amount of compensation you can recover in a personal injury case is directly influenced by your percentage of fault under a comparative negligence system. As your level of fault increases, the amount of compensation you can receive decreases. To determine how much compensation you are entitled to, the court or insurance company will calculate your percentage of fault based on the evidence presented.
Steps to determine your compensation:
- Assess your total damages: This includes economic damages (such as medical bills, lost wages, and property damage) and non-economic damages (such as pain and suffering).
- Determine your percentage of fault: The court or insurance company will evaluate the circumstances of the accident and assign a percentage of fault to each party involved.
- Reduce your compensation: Your total compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault. For example, if your total damages are $100,000 and you are found to be 30% at fault, your compensation will be reduced by 30%, leaving you with $70,000.
Why it matters:
Comparative negligence can significantly reduce the amount of compensation you receive. Even if you have a strong case, being partially at fault could lead to a smaller settlement or judgment.
Key takeaway:
The more fault assigned to you, the less compensation you can recover. In some cases, exceeding a certain threshold of fault (50% or 51%) could prevent you from recovering any damages at all.
4. Proving Fault in Comparative Negligence Cases
To maximize your compensation, it’s crucial to minimize your percentage of fault. Proving fault in a comparative negligence case requires gathering strong evidence to show that the other party was primarily responsible for the accident.
Here are some steps to help prove the other party’s fault:
- Collect evidence: Take photos of the accident scene, gather witness statements, and obtain police reports to support your claim.
- Seek medical attention: Document your injuries and medical treatment to establish the severity of your damages.
- Hire an attorney: A personal injury lawyer can help build a strong case, gather evidence, and negotiate with insurance companies to reduce your percentage of fault.
- Reconstruct the accident: In some cases, accident reconstruction experts may be needed to prove how the accident occurred and who was at fault.
Why it matters:
The stronger your case is, the lower your percentage of fault is likely to be. This will help maximize the amount of compensation you can recover.
Key takeaway:
Gathering strong evidence and working with legal professionals can help reduce your percentage of fault and increase your compensation in a comparative negligence case.
Conclusion
Comparative negligence can have a significant impact on your personal injury claim, reducing the amount of compensation you can recover based on your level of fault. Understanding the comparative negligence system in your state is essential to knowing how much compensation you’re entitled to and how your percentage of fault will affect your settlement.
By collecting evidence, working with legal professionals, and proving the other party’s responsibility, you can reduce your share of fault and maximize your compensation. Whether your state follows pure, modified, or contributory negligence, it’s important to navigate the legal process carefully to ensure you receive fair compensation.
Disclaimer: The content of this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information provided is based on general research and is not intended to be a substitute for professional legal advice or consultation with a qualified attorney. Always consult with a lawyer regarding your specific legal situation.
Related Articles
- How Long Does It Take to Receive Compensation After a Settlement?
- How Comparative Negligence Affects Your Compensation
- Emotional Distress Compensation: What You Need to Know
- The Role of Expert Witnesses in Proving Damages
- Lost Wages and Loss of Earning Capacity: How They Affect Your Settlement
More from This Category
- Future Medical Expenses: How to Claim Compensation for Ongoing Treatment
- Maximizing Your Compensation: Tips for Negotiating with Insurance Companies
- What Are Punitive Damages and When Can You Receive Them?
- Economic vs. Non-Economic Damages: What’s the Difference?
- How to Calculate Pain and Suffering in Personal Injury Cases